Yeah, I need to put quite a bit of time into the Thrift parts of #336 to make sure it's usable...would rather not be under the gun.
Evan On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 3:17 PM, Jonathan Ellis<[email protected]> wrote: > After we fix the crash-on-manual-compaction bug you found (and > committing the obvious outstanding reviewed patches) I think we are > ready for RC1. > > 336 isn't going to make it into 0.4. I don't even know what the API > would look like -- it's hard to come up with a structure that supports > full mix of insert and delete without being way too clunky on simple > cases. So this is really best left for 0.5. > > 332 is too much code to try to squeeze into 0.4 and should also be > left for 0.5. Like I commented in the issue, if you want to tweak > Thrift to allow a no-op consistency level to be passed I am okay with > that in the name of forwards compatibility. > > -Jonathan > > On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 3:30 PM, Chris Goffinet<[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi >> >> Do we have an idea yet when we will cut beta2? Getting the deadlock fix >> (waiting on merge) before the cut would be great. Any others we want to try >> to get in? >> >> I'd like to see a stable API if possible for beta2. This means we would >> need: >> >> #336 >> #322 (at least the interface change) >> >> Thoughts? >> >> -Chris >> > -- Evan Weaver
