On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 10:22 PM, Jaakko <rosvopaalli...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, that is of course true. However, I don't think this modification > would make the algorithm much less simple. We still consider the most > loaded node only, but take into account which DC the node is in. > Without that extra step, loadbalance only works for rack unaware. If > we make this change, nothing would change for rack unaware, but for > other strategies things would be better, I think.
Let's give it a try! -Jonathan
