Fair enough - thanks for the clarifications. -Nate
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Eric Evans <eev...@rackspace.com> wrote: > On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 10:46 -0800, Nathan McCall wrote: >> I noticed the pom file was missing in the 0.6 branch, but still >> available in trunk. > > The pom.xml should be in contrib/maven on both 0.6 and trunk. > >> Is this an oversight or is the focus going to be on ant going >> forward? > > The focus has only ever been on ant, (most of the committers opinions > range somewhere between "apathy" and "abject disgust" when it comes to > maven). > > The pom.xml was contributed by someone who wanted it, and hasn't ever > been very well maintained TTBMK. > > > -- > Eric Evans > eev...@rackspace.com > >
