still happens. i just downloaded 882359 from subversion. thx!
On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 16:58 -0600, Jonathan Ellis wrote: > This sounds like a bug that was fixed in trunk. Could you retest with > that code? > > -Jonathan > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 4:49 PM, B. Todd Burruss <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm doing some testing with build 881977. I have setup a 3 node cluster > > with ReplicationFactor = 2, reads using ConsistencyLevel.ONE, and writes > > using ConsistencyLevel.QUORUM. If I take one node out of the cluster, > > then do some writes I would expect that all the writes would succeed > > because I still have 2 nodes in the cluster, so I have a quorum. My > > guess is that since one of the nodes the quorum write "should" use is > > down, the write fails. > > > > Is this the expected behavior? Is hinted handoff in the future? > > > > If not, this seems to make quorum kinda useless since some writes will > > fail if ANY node becomes unavailable for whatever reason. > > > > thx! > > > > > >
