On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 11:17 AM, Dan Di Spaltro
<dan.dispal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I haven't, is this common though?

Short answer?  Yes. :)

> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Jonathan Ellis <jbel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Have you tried get_range_slice on trunk instead?  get_key_range's
>> design is kind of fundamentally broken, so we're deprecating it in
>> favor of get_range_slice starting in 0.5.  (gkr will still be in the
>> 0.5 series, but probably not after that.)
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Dan Di Spaltro
>> <dan.dispal...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I am trying to use get_key_range for an offline type job over about
>>> 18k keys and it keeps timing out.  My current setup is 3x4G memory
>>> machines with OPP and a replication factor of 2, and an rpctimeout of
>>> 180s.    To combat this I've actually made the KeyCachedFraction 100
>>> to see if this could help, and no matter how few of the key ranges I
>>> want, I am unable to get any response from the system.
>>>
>>> get_slice's work fine, among all the other commands, I just can't seem
>>> to get get_key_range working.  My current workload has few keys and
>>> lots of columns.
>>>
>>> Any advice to debug this would be appreciated.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Dan Di Spaltro
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Dan Di Spaltro
>

Reply via email to