We are using trunk. 0.5 beta / trunk is better than 0.4 at the 0.4 functionality and IMO is production ready (although you should always test first), but I would not yet rely on the new stuff (bootstrap, loadbalance, and moving nodes around in general).
-Jonathan On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Adam Fisk <[email protected]> wrote: > Helpful thread guys. In general, Jonathan, would you recommend > building from trunk for new deployments at our current snapshot in > time? Are you using trunk at Rackspace? > > Thanks. > > -Adam > > > On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 6:18 PM, Jonathan Ellis <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Freeman, Tim <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Looking at the Cassandra mbean's, the attributes of ROW-MUTATION-STAGE and >>> ROW-READ-STAGE and RESPONSE-STAGE are all less than 10. >>> MINOR-COMPACTION-POOL reports 1218 pending tasks. >> >> That's probably the culprit right there. Something is wrong if you >> have 1200 pending compactions. >> >> This is something that upgrading to trunk will help with right away >> since we parallelize compactions there. >> >> Another thing you can do is increase the memtable limits so you are >> not flushing + compacting so often with your insert traffic. >> >> -Jonathan >> > > > > -- > Adam Fisk > http://www.littleshoot.org | http://adamfisk.wordpress.com | > http://twitter.com/adamfisk >
