Public IPs and ports make it so. -----Original Message----- From: Jake Luciani [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: December 2, 2009 4:39 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Cassandra access control
If there is a use case to open a Cassandra cluster to the world then I agree. Sent from my iPhone On Dec 2, 2009, at 4:24 PM, "Coe, Robin" <[email protected]> wrote: > NoSQL doesn't mean no security. A production database engine has to > protect its data. The trick is to make the auth framework fast enough > that it doesn't adversely affect performance and robust enough that an > application requesting data doesn't have to jump through hoops to get > it. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jake Luciani [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: December 2, 2009 4:00 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Cassandra access control > > +1 this is nosql afterall. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Dec 2, 2009, at 3:54 PM, Mark Robson <[email protected]> wrote: > >> How about we make authentication optional, and have the protocol >> being stateful only if you want to authenticate? >> >> That way we don't break backwards compatibility or introduce extra >> complexity for people who don't need it. >> >> Mark
