yes and no -- that's about 4200/s, which is typical for only a single thread but 1/3 to 1/5 of what you'd expect it to max out (on our quad-core test boxes) when you add client threads
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 10:38 AM, Timo Nentwig <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi! > > I just downloaded, installed, start cassandra and ran very simple > "benchmark": write n times something with > key==value==testInsertAndGetAndRemove_n (one thread). > > For n==10 million on a 7200rpm HDD (4G RAM - there should have be > "reasonably" free mem however I didn't check) this took 40min (insert()ing > one after another). Reading them one by one in sequence delivers about 100/s, > reading in 1.000er batches (i.e. multigetColumn()) takes 5-10s (depending on > n, the higher the slower). > > Are this typical numbers for cassandra (0.5)? I actually took the > configuration as it was.
