Is a 3 million records set not a big deal for Solr? If I consider about 30 properties per item, I have to give Solr 90 millions properties to consider. Is that volume still correct for such a solution?
And regarding lucene on top of Cassandra, can people share their feed back, if any, about such a solution. Pros & cons vs Solr for instance. Thank you. 2009/12/17, Jake Luciani <[email protected]>: > True replication and scale. > > On Dec 17, 2009, at 4:56 PM, Josh <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I've used solr a bunch (And I'd cosign gabriel: Solr's fantastic) and >> I'm trying to work my head around Cassandra, but I'm really hazy on >> what the Cassandra+Lucene combo gives you. What are you trying to >> accomplish? (Meant earnestly: I'm really curious) >> >> josh >> @schulz >> http://schulzone.org >> >> >> On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Jake Luciani <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> You can also put lucene on top of Cassandra by using. >>> >>> http://github.com/tjake/Lucandra >>> >>> On Dec 17, 2009, at 4:43 PM, gabriele renzi <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 7:48 PM, David MARTIN >>>> <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> That's what I was thinking. And I'm glad to read Apache solr in >>>>> your >>>>> answer as it is one of my main leads. >>>> >>>> as a happy solr user, I second the suggestion, lucene (the >>>> technology >>>> behind solr) handles a number of documents like that without a >>>> sweat, >>>> and solr gives your replication and a few other good things. >>> >
