On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 17:50 -0800, Adam Fisk wrote: > Any reason you guys do it this way? It's *much* easier to maintain a > working ant build using maven as the base than the other way around > (mvn ant:ant).
I can't speak for anyone but myself ... but: 1. I don't care enough for the special features (the stuff above and beyond what ant is providing), to the invest the effort in learning it. 2. Maven triggers my gag reflex. -- Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com
