Don't understand your last statement "(though so does date-based strings and OrderPreservingPartioner)." What do you mean that using TimeUUID provide a better distribution when using OrderPreservingPartioner. Or there is no effect if using OrderPreservingPartioner
Thanks On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 6:19 PM, Eric Evans <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 2009-12-22 at 13:48 +0100, Daniel Lundin wrote: > > Has anybody already spent energy + time thinking about generic > > TimeUUID partitioning? Seems like it could be a useful thing, since > > time series data is quite common. > > I think it's possible, but it's going to provide very poor distribution > properties, (though so does date-based strings and > OrderPreservingPartioner). > > -- > Eric Evans > [email protected] > >
