2009/12/23 XL.Pan <[email protected]>: > I think you can avoid this , eg : > A, B, C is seed node and D, E is non-seed. A crash and damage. > > 1) re-configure the node A to a non-seed; > 2) starting the non-seed nood A will re-bootstrap; > 3) Though the original seed nodes will decrease 1, any other node, eg D, can > re-configure other nodes, eg B, C, E, as seed nodes. > 4) Then the seed nodes in the ring will be : > Node->Seeds List > A --> B, C, D; > B --> A, B, C; > C --> A, B, C; > D --> B, C, E; > E --> A, B, C; > > Am I right?? ;-)
Yes, although IMO to avoid confusion you will want to re-standardize on a single set of seeds as soon as possible. -Jonathan
