On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Jonathan Ellis <jbel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> the standard workaround is to change your data model to use non-super > columns instead. > > supercolumns are really only for relatively small numbers of > subcolumns until 598 is addressed. > is there any limit on the number of supercolumns i can have?
