On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Jonathan Ellis <jbel...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 4:49 PM, Erik Holstad <erikhols...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Haha!
> > Thanks. Well I'm z little bit worried about this but since the indexes
> are
> > pretty
> > small I don't think it is going to be too bad. But was mostly thinking
> about
> > performance and and having the index row as a bottleneck for writing,
> since
> > the
> > partition is per row.
>
> Writing N columns to 1 row is faster than writing 1 column to N rows,
> even when all N are coming from different clients.  Our concurrency
> story there is excellent.
>
That sounds good, and the same thing goes for reading, cause that is
basically
what I'm looking for, faster reads, not too worried about the writes.

Thanks a lot!

Reply via email to