Then you definitely want one row, range queries are slower than we'd like right now. (Ticket to fix that: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-821)
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Erik Holstad <erikhols...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Jonathan Ellis <jbel...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 4:49 PM, Erik Holstad <erikhols...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > Haha! >> > Thanks. Well I'm z little bit worried about this but since the indexes >> > are >> > pretty >> > small I don't think it is going to be too bad. But was mostly thinking >> > about >> > performance and and having the index row as a bottleneck for writing, >> > since >> > the >> > partition is per row. >> >> Writing N columns to 1 row is faster than writing 1 column to N rows, >> even when all N are coming from different clients. Our concurrency >> story there is excellent. > > That sounds good, and the same thing goes for reading, cause that is > basically > what I'm looking for, faster reads, not too worried about the writes. > > Thanks a lot! >