Hello, I am not a committer to the project currently, although I have submitted some patches. Usually if I had an enhancement I found useful I'd submit a patch or if I found a bug I'd fix it along with reporting it and have the patch ready.
I mentioned to hammett a little while ago that if no one else winds up being interested in taking on the future of Windsor/Microkernel that I would welcome the opportunity, however I also understand since I am not currently a committer that I would understand not wanting to blindly bring someone "unknown" in either. He said that it is currently open only to committers (which makes sense of course and I agree with), however he also suggested that I bring it up to the group at large, so therefore I leave it open as an option on the table. Thanks, Rick Fleming On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 6:58 PM, hammett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Following up the last announcement, so far two committers stepped in. > Some positions are still open: > > - ActiveRecord - Markus > - MonoRail - Ken > - Windsor - ?? > - Facilities (step in for one of them if you want) > - Common Services > - DynamicProxy > > Components > - Castle Validator > - DictionaryAdapter > - Binder > - Email/TemplateEngine > - Scheduler > - Pagination > > > We would expect from the leaders to oversee the development (near and > long term), set up goals, roadmaps, coordinate the documentation > effort and release it. > > -- > Cheers, > hammett > http://hammett.castleproject.org/ > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
