imo the current website's look is awesome. have a much more professional
scent than the apache site for example.
and it is 'partitioned' as it is. The base page is linking to MR, AR,
Windsor, etc.  we just need to elaborate that a bit to reflect the recent
project splits
each project's main page should hold some data on the project (team,
download release, download nightly, link to svn), and as an entry point to
docs and articles

as for svn:
a single repo makes sense. splitting only if and when it would be needed
(YAGNI)
needed chages:
1. lib per project
2. docs per project in the tree - i.e:

/
  mr
     trunk
        src
        lib
        docs
     branch
        1.0.4
           src
           lib
           docs
   ar
     ...
3. a separate build per project



On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 11:47 AM, Jonathon Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Were you thinking more like the Apache Software Foundation site? Where it
> tells you about the umbrella community and lists all the projects. As the
> ASF site does, we could have the latest news which would include new
> releases. It would also be good to have a project catalogue/listing where it
> lists the latest release of all the projects. A page like
> http://www.apache.org/foundation/ would also be useful in explaining what
> the Castle Project is becoming.
>
> The way ASF displays project would probably work for us too. For example,
> the log4net site <http://logging.apache.org/log4net/index.html> has all of
> its details and documentation in one place.
>
> While we are on the topic of rearranging things, the layout of the ASF svn
> repository would probably be the best way to restructure castle. Only having
> one repository makes things easier to manage and you still get the advantage
> of each project having its own directory with its src and documentation in
> the trunk and branch/taggable.
>
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 6:46 PM, Krzysztof Kozmic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>>
>> As we're spliting the project and some of them will soon be released, it's
>> time to think about redesiging the website as well, to better accomodate for
>> these changes. Big parts of it are outdated, and it's hard to find some
>> information on it. I'm not a web-guy, so unfortunately I can't contribute to
>> this effort, but I'd be happy to criticize others ideas :)
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>> Krzysztof
>>
>>
>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
>> This message is intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which
>> it is addressed. This communication may contain information that is
>> proprietary, privileged, confidential or otherwise legally exempt from
>> disclosure. If you are not the named addressee, you are not authorized to
>> read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it. If
>> you have received this message in error, please delete all copies of this
>> message and notify the sender immediately by return mail or fax ATSI
>> S.A.(+4812) 285 36 04.
>> Any email attachment may contain software viruses which could damage your
>> own computer system. Whilst reasonable precaution has been taken to minimise
>> this risk, we cannot accept liability for any damage which you sustain as a
>> result of software viruses. You should therefore carry out your own virus
>> checks before opening any attachments.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Jonathon Rossi
>
>
> >
>


-- 
Ken Egozi.
http://www.kenegozi.com/blog
http://www.musicglue.com
http://www.castleproject.org
http://www.gotfriends.co.il

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to