You dah man!

2009/1/18 Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected]>

>  Craig Neuwirt pisze:
>
> So will this still work with interface proxy without target?
>
> like a charm.
>
> I added these two tests to check for that and they both pass. Any other
> scenario you had in mind?
>
>
>         [Test]
>         public void SelectorWorksForInterfaceProxyWithoutTarget()
>         {
>             var options = new ProxyGenerationOptions
>                               {
>                                   Selector = new
> TypeInterceptorSelector<ReturnNewTInterceptor>()
>                               };
>             var proxy =
>
> generator.CreateInterfaceProxyWithoutTarget(typeof(ISimpleInterface), new
> Type[0], options,
>                                                             new
> ReturnNewTInterceptor()) as ISimpleInterface;
>             Assert.IsNotNull(proxy);
>             var i = proxy.Do();
>             Assert.AreEqual(0, i);
>         }
>
>         [Test]
>         [ExpectedException(typeof(NotImplementedException), ExpectedMessage
> = "This is a DynamicProxy2 error: the interceptor attempted to 'Proceed' for
> a method without a target, for example, an interface method or an abstract
> method")]
>         public void
> ProxyThrowsForInterfaceProxyWithoutTargetWhenSelectorSelectsNoInterceptor()
>         {
>             var options = new ProxyGenerationOptions
>             {
>                 Selector = new TypeInterceptorSelector<AddTwoInterceptor>()
>             };
>             var interceptor = new CallCountingInterceptor();
>             var proxy =
>
> generator.CreateInterfaceProxyWithoutTarget(typeof(ISimpleInterface), new
> Type[0], options,
>                                                             interceptor) as
> ISimpleInterface;
>             Assert.IsNotNull(proxy);
>             var i = proxy.Do();
>
>         }
>
>
> 2009/1/18 Jonathon Rossi <[email protected]>
>
>> Applied in r5522. Also removed UseSelector property as indicated.
>>
>> Please use tabs next time :)
>>
>> Thanks. If you find any problems let me know so we can get them sorted.
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Krzysztof Koźmic <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I finally found some time to sit and re-implement the iinterceptor
>>> selector support in DP like we discussed in the other thread.
>>> I uploaded the patch here:
>>>
>>> http://support.castleproject.org/projects/DYNPROXY/issues/view/DYNPROXY-ISSUE-37
>>> (the *_byref file)
>>> along with screenshot that shows how generated code looks now.
>>> Please review it and if you have any comments or find any issues with
>>> the patch, ping me.
>>>
>>> PS
>>>
>>> After I uploaded it I remembered that I forgot to remove the UseSelector
>>> property. If you're going to apply the patch, please remove it first (it
>>> affects few classes and tests so they will have to be updated as well)
>>>
>>> cheers
>>>
>>> Krzysztof
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>  Jonathon Rossi
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to