This has been suggested/discussed previously - although not for a while. (2006 was when I bought it up). Personally - I don't understand why we aren't shipping our own build-tools folder with nant/nunit etc...
j. On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Tim Barcz <[email protected]> wrote: > Josh Robb/Castle Team, > > Greetings....I've always thought it too much work to build the castle > source on a new machine or a fresh checkout. For example, in the "How to > Build" file there is a line "Everything should compile fine using NAnt 0.85 > final.". If that is the case, guide the user this way using some defaults. > Nant does not need to be installed and through the use of relative pathing > and batch files, we can have a project where we get the source, double click > a batch file and voila, built! > > As such I've submitted a small patch which moves the project in this > direction. I am more than willing to commit more but am hesitant to put the > time and effort in when the idea may not fly with the development team. > > While many of you may not see an issue, I personally have had various times > where the requirements for components to be installed in order to build has > raised the friction bar to a "too high" level. My goal in submitting this > patch is to be part of the solution.... > > If you have any questions regarding thoughts/motives/ideas please know that > I am an open book, > > Tim > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
