I honestly don't get it - and believe me, I'm trying. In the very "getting started" article I mention the correct usage pattern: http://www.castleproject.org/container/gettingstarted/part1/code.html
Search for container+release and you'll get more hits http://www.google.com/custom?q=container+release&sa=Google+Search&cof=S:http://www.castlestronghold.com;GL:1;VLC:%23373737;AH:center;LH:63;LC:%230A50A1;GFNT:%235B5B5B;L:http://www.castleproject.org/images/castle-logo.gif;ALC:%230A50A1;BIMG:http://www.castleproject.org/images/bg.png;LW:280;T:%235B5B5B;AWFID:3d565acacdd9f388;&domains=castleproject.org&sitesearch=castleproject.org Your usage pattern seems to beg for container hierarchy anyway. I'm not standing in front of this issue, though. If you - community - think this is how it's supposed to be, I'm fine - meritocracy: i'm not doing much for the project nowadays, so I wont make your life harder :-) But I read some divergence of opinions on this thread. On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Victor Kornov <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't want to make trade offs ;) > What I'm trying to say is this right & deterministic behavior leads to > unexpected, not obvious & mostly undiscovered by devs issues like memory > leaks. > Isn't there a way not to educate everyone on your way of doing things, but > to slap them in the face when they do it wrong? ;) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
