Do we need to include source files in the dist?I never quite understood why people are doing that
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 1:01 AM, Jonathon Rossi <[email protected]> wrote: > OK. > > One thing I'll point out is that I exported all source files including > AssemblyInfo from a clean working copy. > > > On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 8:00 AM, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I think that we can pretty much say that Facilities that want to release >> in the near future would have to do it with Windsor 2.0, or we would have a >> 2.0.1 if there are any bugs that haven't been caught so far. >> >> >> On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 12:58 AM, Jonathon Rossi <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> I was going to set up nant to build it, but ended up just doing it >>> manually. I know you shouldn't release manually but I did. We'll have to >>> look at a way we can build the packages for all the projects. >>> >>> Are all the facilities and services going to release separately, as 2 >>> packages or as part of MK+Windsor? >>> >>> On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 7:54 AM, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Jonathon,a quick question, how did you build the release zip for SF? >>>> nant package? >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Jono >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > > -- > Jono > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
