That makes sense. Then why do we bother releasing source in a zip file, why not just make developers pull it from svn?
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 1:48 AM, Roelof Blom <[email protected]> wrote: > A lot of references to our own projects are also missing. The csproj's and > sln's were removed from the zip to prevent people 'polluting' the lists > saying they can't build from the source. > > I guess we should include a readme in the zipped source telling you cannot > build from these sources. > > On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 5:31 PM, Jonathon Rossi <[email protected]>wrote: > >> The source is also missing csproj files. I am about to commit a fix to >> exclude the how to build.txt since you can't build from this source because >> it doesn't even have the SharedLibs directory. >> >> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 12:43 AM, Krzysztof Kozmic @ work < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> the downloads on daily builds site have zip with sourcecode but .sln >>> files are missing. >>> There's also misleading information in a text file that says you >>> should run build.cmd file, but it is not there. >>> >>> I think it's simple omission when taking the code from svn, but it >>> would be nice if it worked. >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Jono >> >> >> >> > > > > -- Jono --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
