Sure. I will also be doing some work on facility soon, and probably will make a release.
Tuna Toksöz Eternal sunshine of the open source mind. http://devlicio.us/blogs/tuna_toksoz http://tunatoksoz.com http://twitter.com/tehlike On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 7:51 PM, Germán Schuager <[email protected]> wrote: > Programatic configuration would be ok too, but that would imply more > implementation work and a change in the way that most of us are configuring > the facility. > > The ideas that I've mention are not specifically about programatic > configuration, they are more general (things like support for CpBT, usage of > ISessionFactory.GetCurrentSession instead of ISessionManager.OpenSession, > etc) and don't know if they apply to this facility or to a new one. Anyway, > I'm working on this in my spare time and when/if I arrive to something > functional I will tell you to review it (if you are interested, of course) > > > On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Tuna Toksoz <[email protected]> wrote: > >> INhibernateFacilityEventRegistry would be a better name, but i still >> prefer programatic configuration. >> What do you think about programatic configuration? >> >> >> Tuna Toksöz >> Eternal sunshine of the open source mind. >> >> http://devlicio.us/blogs/tuna_toksoz >> http://tunatoksoz.com >> http://twitter.com/tehlike >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Germán Schuager <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> The facility is not registered itself in the container. >>> >>> I've taken a look at the code and found 2 ways to implement this without >>> too much trouble: >>> >>> 1) configuration option for a custom activator and inherit from >>> SessionFactoryActivator in user code. >>> >>> 2) use the same approach as with IConfigurationContributor: look for a >>> INHFacilityEvents (awfull name) in the container and use it wherever we >>> need. >>> >>> I like option 2. >>> >>> >>> PD: before starting the work in programatic configuration I'd like to >>> comment you a few ideas that I've been working on. >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Tuna Toksoz <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> hmm, you're putting more and more ideas into play ;). I was thinking >>>> about events but don't like to have the event stuff in XML, so this looks >>>> like it is better to wait for the programatic configuration of the >>>> facility. >>>> BTW, I haven't ever tried but can we resolve/retrieve the Facility from >>>> the container? >>>> >>>> Tuna Toksöz >>>> Eternal sunshine of the open source mind. >>>> >>>> http://devlicio.us/blogs/tuna_toksoz >>>> http://tunatoksoz.com >>>> http://twitter.com/tehlike >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 6:38 PM, Germán Schuager <[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> ISessionFactory >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
