Since we don't support .NET 2.0 in Castle anymore (except Core+DP2 which have no 3rd party dependencies). Is there any reason for keeping them all separate?
My proposal is not to separate 2.0/3.5 binaries until we get to .NET 4.0, where we may have to because it has a different runtime. This is an example of what I am going to start doing. I'd like to hear your thoughts. /SharedLibs/NHibernate.dll /SharedLibs/Boo.Lang.dll /SharedLibs/net/log4net.dll /SharedLibs/net/Rhino.Mocks.CPP.Interfaces.dll /SharedLibs/net/NUnitLite.Silverlight.dll /SharedLibs/net/NHibernate.Linq.dll /SharedLibs/mono/log4net.dll On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 1:06 AM, Patrick McEvoy <[email protected]>wrote: > > There's also a problem with the nunit detection, with mono it was > looking for nunit-console2, however since the mono-2.0 transition it's > been renamed back to nunit-console. Another symbolic link fixed this, > see common.xml:314 if you wanna fix it. > > There is no need to separate mono/net assemblies now and I don't see > why that would change. I can rewrite the nant scripts to just use > these paths SharedLibs/2.0, SharedLibs/3.5? Would this be welcomed? Or > for the time being (and minimal fiction) can one of you just replicate > SharedLibs/net -> SharedLibs/mono and apply the patch below... > > > https://qmtech.svn.beanstalkapp.com/castleproject_mono/trunk/patches/common-xml-sharedlibs.diff > > On Jun 3, 2:40 pm, Roelof Blom <[email protected]> wrote: > > Agreeing again with Jono: It would make more sense to let the Mono build > use > > the same assemblies as the Windows build, and copy any mono-specific > > assemblies from the SharedLibs\mono directories. > > > > -- Roelof. > > > > On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Jonathon Rossi <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > There are files in /SharedLibs/mono that aren't even in > /SharedLibs/net. > > > > > Do you really need to make an exact copy from net into mono, it seems a > > > little redundant. > > > > > On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:28 PM, Patrick McEvoy < > [email protected]>wrote: > > > > >> Cool, TC is getting a lot further, still need SharedLibs/mono/2.0 > > >> updating with all libs from SharedLibs/net/* :) > > > > >> On Jun 3, 11:09 am, Roelof Blom <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > I've applied both mono-nant-tweaks2.diff and > > >> remove-ar-linq-on-mono.diff, > > >> > let's see how it goes. > > > > >> > I tend to agree with Jonathon that we need a working > NAnt.exe.config, so > > >> > other people can easily build Castle on Mono. > > > > >> > -- Roelof. > > > > >> > On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 5:31 AM, Jonathon Rossi <[email protected]> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > The build looks like it is going good now. We just need to work on > > >> fixing > > >> > > things so that they all build and run on mono. > > > > >> > > So that other people can build on linux fairly easily, I think it > > >> would be > > >> > > better to modify the NAnt.exe.config. > > > > >> > > On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Patrick McEvoy < > > >> [email protected]>wrote: > > > > >> > >> FYI... Packaging nant/nunit may be helpful with windows however > not > > >> so > > >> > >> with linux. Since most distros will modified the mono install to > a > > >> > >> certain extent (and this is likely to include paths) the castle > > >> > >> shipped NAnt.exe.config is referencing paths that don't exist. I > > >> > >> assure you mono is installed exactly as it should be using the > most > > >> > >> update mono packages available from debian-cli team. So either I > hack > > >> > >> my install (I have done this), we hack the NAnt.exe.config or > install > > >> > >> & use nant from the packages. Unfortunately nant-0.85 is highest > > >> > >> version available and 0.86beta is required for mono-3.5 target. > So > > >> > >> the last option (which is obviously the best) isn't available and > > >> NAnt > > >> > >> does not play nice installing from source on linux. > Linux/Mono/Castle > > >> > >> is going to be a bumpy ride for a little while longer. However I > do > > >> > >> think Castle CI on mono/linux will help grow the team to tackle > these > > >> > >> simple yet time consuming issues for the benefit of the whole > > >> > >> community. > > > > >> > >> On Jun 2, 10:43 am, Roelof Blom <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > >> > That patch was already applied, the build log quite clearly > states > > >> > >> what's > > >> > >> > the problem: > > > > >>http://www.castleproject.org:8090/viewLog.html?tab=buildLog&buildType. > .. > > > > >> > >> > On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 8:22 PM, Patrick McEvoy < > > >> > >> [email protected]>wrote: > > > > >> > >> > > It needs this... > > > > >>https://qmtech.svn.beanstalkapp.com/castleproject_mono/trunk/patches/. > > >> > >> .. > > > > >> > >> > > And something like this doing and committing... > > > > >> > >> > > cp SharedLibs/net/2.0/*.dll SharedLibs/mono/2.0 > > >> > >> > > cp SharedLibs/net/3.5/*.dll SharedLibs/mono/2.0 > > >> > >> > > cp SharedLibs/net/*.dll SharedLibs/mono/2.0 > > > > >> > >> > > And also ar linq won't build because of NH.Linq requires > > >> > >> > > System.Data.Services, patch coming real soon... > > > > >> > >> > > On May 31, 6:42 pm, Roelof Blom <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >> > >> > > > Patrick, > > > > >> > >> > > > The build keeps failing on Mono, can you verify that Mono > is > > >> > >> correctly > > >> > >> > > > installed? > > > > >> > >> > > > -- Roelof > > > > >> > >> > > > On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 7:38 PM, <[email protected]> > > >> wrote: > > >> > >> > > > > Build Castle::Trunk - Debug (Mono) #6 failed > > >> > >> > > > > Agent: Mono Linux > > >> > >> > > > > Build results: > > > > >> > >> > http://www.castleproject.org:8090/viewLog.html?buildId=79&buildTypeId > > >> . > > >> > >> > > .. > > > > >> > >> > > > > Changes included (1 change) > > >> > >> > > > > ==================================================== > > >> > >> > > > > Change 5730 by roelofb (1 file): > > >> > >> > > > > Another tweak for the Mono build agent > > > > >> > >> > > > > see more information about changed files: > > > > >> > >> > http://www.castleproject.org:8090/viewLog.html?tab=buildChangesDiv&bu > > >> . > > >> > >> > > .. > > > > >> > ============================================================================ > > >> > >> > > > > Configure email notifications: > > > > >> > >> > http://www.castleproject.org:8090/profile.html?init=1#notifications > > > > >> > > -- > > >> > > Jono > > > > > -- > > > Jono > > > -- Jono --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
