and how about in \InversionOfControl\src\Castle.MicroKernel\Lifestyle \Pool\DefaultPool.cs
it would seem syncronization is redundant here because all usages of "inUse" are wrapped in a ReaderWriterLock On Dec 16, 12:15 am, Krzysztof Koźmic (2) <[email protected]> wrote: > yes, as far as I can tell it is redundant. > > On 15 Gru, 14:07, Simon <[email protected]> wrote: > > > In the file > > \InversionOfControl\src\Castle.MicroKernel\SubSystems\Naming > > \KeySearchNamingSubSystem.cs > > > It makes use of Hashtable.Synchronized and ArrayList.Synchronized. > > > But since all the methods on KeySearchNamingSubSystem have the > > attribute [MethodImpl(MethodImplOptions.Synchronized)] doesnt that > > make syncronizing the collections redundant? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
