Everyone, Anyone opposed to retiring Batch Registration facility? I'm +1
On Dec 22, 2:55 am, Eric Hauser <[email protected]> wrote: > Should the Batch Registration facility be retired? It has had an > obsolete notice on its documentation for a long time, and people have > been directed not to use it in favor over the registration API. > > On Dec 21, 6:10 am, John Simons <[email protected]> wrote: > > > This is it the last piece of the puzzle. > > It is time for Facilities to be released. > > > Here is the list: > > - ActiveRecordIntegration > > - AutomaticTransactionManagement > > - BatchRegistration > > - Logging > > - NHibernateIntegration > > - Synchronize > > - WCF Integration > > > Henrik Feldt, Alex Henderson, Tuna Toksoz and Craig Neuwirt, if you > > guys are busy and can't release the project, please let us know and we > > will give you a hand. > > > If there is anything else preventing you from releasing let everyone > > know so we can come up with a solution. > > > Cheers > > John -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
