This is from Ayende’s example 
(http://ayende.com/Blog/archive/2009/05/01/nhibernate-validator.aspx) and uses 
the NH Validation syntax:

---------------

[NotNullNotEmpty]

[Length(25)]

public virtual string Title

 

Schema Generation -
Before: Title  
<http://search.microsoft.com/default.asp?so=RECCNT&siteid=us%2Fdev&p=1&nq=NEW&qu=NVARCHAR&IntlSearch=&boolean=PHRASE&ig=01&i=09&i=99>
 NVARCHAR(255)  
<http://search.microsoft.com/default.asp?so=RECCNT&siteid=us%2Fdev&p=1&nq=NEW&qu=null&IntlSearch=&boolean=PHRASE&ig=01&i=09&i=99>
 null

 

After: Title  
<http://search.microsoft.com/default.asp?so=RECCNT&siteid=us%2Fdev&p=1&nq=NEW&qu=NVARCHAR&IntlSearch=&boolean=PHRASE&ig=01&i=09&i=99>
 NVARCHAR(25)  
<http://search.microsoft.com/default.asp?so=RECCNT&siteid=us%2Fdev&p=1&nq=NEW&qu=not&IntlSearch=&boolean=PHRASE&ig=01&i=09&i=99>
 not  
<http://search.microsoft.com/default.asp?so=RECCNT&siteid=us%2Fdev&p=1&nq=NEW&qu=null&IntlSearch=&boolean=PHRASE&ig=01&i=09&i=99>
 null

 

From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of John Simons
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 4:15 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Some thoughts on the Validator Component Roadmap

 

Point 3 should actually be, it provides an extension point to support web 
browser validation.

What is point 2, an example please?

Cheers
John

 

  _____  

From: G. Richard Bellamy <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Thu, 14 January, 2010 10:32:02 AM
Subject: Some thoughts on the Validator Component Roadmap

I’d like to see:

1.       Model validation

2.       Schema generation based on Validation Attributes

3.       Client-side validation using jQuery or Prototype or whatever

 

>From what I know (and please correct me if I’m wrong), we currently do #1 & 
>#3. NH does #1 & #2.

 

As I see it, I have two options:

1.       Get with the NH Validation folks, and see what it would take to merge 
the two codebases, or

2.       Make our Validation compliant with the NH Schema generation process.

 

Also, didn’t someone mention the idea of a standardized validation interface, 
kinda like the Common Service Locator interface? Did I completely mis-remember 
that?

 

Thoughts?

 

-rb

 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.

 

  _____  

See what's on at the movies in your area. Find out now 
<http://au.rd.yahoo.com/movies/mailtagline/*http:/au.movies.yahoo.com/session-times/>
 .

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected].
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.

Reply via email to