On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 3:45 PM, hammett <[email protected]> wrote: > So you have expensive objects that are recyclable? > Care to share more about them? >
I have been developing a framework I tentatively named Monorail D (name subject to discussion). It started out as tribute to the wonderful Castle Monorail but applied to the desktop (hence D) scenarios. It is actually very very much based on the Monorail way of things and supports many of the concepts Its view independent so it will (when done) support WinForms, WPF, Siliverlight,.... Of course, a primary aspect is views and they are expensive to create. The Controllers are transients, but the views are pooled (by default). The Component Burden has been an absolute savior in this area and works beautifully to release/recycle the views. cheers, craig > > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Craig Neuwirt <[email protected]> wrote: > > I depend on Component Burden since I use Pool lifestyles. Why do you > want > > to remove that. It's a common approach when you have expensive > components. > > In my case, its an desktop MVC infrasttructure. > > -- > Cheers, > hammett > http://hammett.castleproject.org/ > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Castle Project Development List" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > . > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. > > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
