i think as soon as there is a checkin or bugfix after a release there should be a schedule for when it will be released.
"non planned" is ok if the source has not changed since the last release. On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 12:39 PM, John Simons <[email protected]> wrote: > I have been on a course for the last week and I got some feedback from > one of the attendees about the term we use on the projects web page > ( http://www.castleproject.org/castle/projects.html ) - "None > planned". > > His advice was that if we say "None planned" it feels like the project > is not active! > So, I was thinking of changing it to be something a bit more > optimistic, such as "Coming soon" or "TBA", but all these terms are > very indefinite, so I actually think we should use terms like "First > quarter of 2010" or "March 2010". > > Thoughts? > > Cheers > John > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Castle Project Development List" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
