Only problem with this is that not all projects have tags yet, so git
describe would fail there. Some sort of fallback has to be devised for
these cases.

BTW it would be great if you could fork 
http://github.com/castleproject/Castle.Buildscripts
and implement this :-)

On Jan 29, 1:46 pm, Andre Loker <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 29 Jan., 16:59, Mauricio Scheffer <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > +1. This currently throws a warning "Assembly generation -- The
> > version '1.0.1.27/1dd3-master build 6' specified for the 'product
> > version' is not in the normal 'major.minor.build.revision' format" but
> > it seems that the warning is removed in .net 4.0:http://bit.ly/aWIYeX
>
> You can safely ignore/disable the warning:
>
> "You can ignore this warning if you encounter it when you create a
> AssemblyInformationalVersionAttribute. The informational version is a
> string that attaches additional version information to an assembly;
> this information is not used at run time. Although you can specify any
> text, a warning message appears on compilation if the string is not in
> the format that is used by the assembly version number, or if it is in
> that format but contains wildcard characters. This warning is
> harmless."
>
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/4a0640cd.aspx

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.

Reply via email to