Perhaps we should just ditch the 2 instead?

Trunk is going to become v3 anyway so I see no point in having a number in the assembly version.

Another issue altogether is that if we would merge Core (parts) + DynamicProxy + (perhaps) DictionaryAdapter maybe a new assembly name altogether would make sense, like making it Castle.Core.dll, although we would have to have a very clear message somewhere to route people looking for DP or DA to the new Core... or perhaps just Castle.dll... I don't know, I'm just throwing ideas out as they run through my head right now.

Krzysztof

On 2010-02-08 11:05, Jonathon Rossi wrote:
The Visual Studio project outputs Castle.DynamicProxy.dll while nant outputs Castle.DynamicProxy2.dll.

I think the only reason the VS project doesn't have the 2 is that its namespace doesn't have a 2 and it was like that since the beginning so we could run 1 and 2 side-by-side. If no one objects, I will fix the VS project to always output with a 2 which is a non-breaking change.

On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 7:27 PM, Julian Birch <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Hi, the Castle Windsor csproj references a
    "Castle.DynamicProxy2.dll".  The Castle DP project compiles to
    Castle.DynamicProxy.dll.  Now, I understand that once this might
    have made sense, but isn't it just unnecessary friction these
    days?  It seems that the only way to determine that this DLL is
    related to the project is to read the XML on one side and hit
    reflection on the other.
    If there isn't a good reason for it, could someone fix it please?
    Julian.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
    Groups "Castle Project Development List" group.
    To post to this group, send email to
    [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>.
    To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
    [email protected]
    <mailto:castle-project-devel%[email protected]>.
    For more options, visit this group at
    http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.




--
Jono
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle 
Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.

Reply via email to