There is not reason we shouldn't be, as long as things are conditional compiled to support 3.5 (we can have 4.0 specific features too).
2010/2/23 Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected]> > when do we start building for .net 4.0? > > there are some things there I would like to start taking advantage of (for > example optional arguments would impact Windsor's constructor matching) > it could also be used for service overrides, like below, although this is > probably not the best idea. > [DefaultValue("someFooKey")] > public IFoo OptionalFoo { get; set; } > > Krzysztof > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Castle Project Development List" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > . > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. > > -- Jono -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
