2010/4/1 John Simons <[email protected]>:
> Krzysztof, I agree with everything you said.
>
> All I was saying is that at the moment we do not have a well defined
> release manager role in Castle, and in order to ensure that releases
> are always compatible we do need one, otherwise releases may not be
> compatible all the time.
>
> So are you proposing to create a release manager role in Castle? And
> I'm talking about a single person looking after Castle releases (the
> same as project leaders).
>
>> For vNext I would like to release the projects in a more synchronized manner.
> Assuming we ever get the left over projects released!

What's left?
AR facility? Henrik's projects (what's up with that? I though he was
about to release them last week or more ago?) and NHFacility *cough*
Tuna *cough*.

>
> Cheers
> John
>
> On Apr 1, 7:49 pm, Krzysztof Koźmic (2) <[email protected]> wrote:
>> John, what do you mean that they may be not compatible?
>>
>> The whole idea of releasing against current released version of the
>> dependencies is that they ought to be compatible.
>> For vNext I would like to release the projects in a more synchronized
>> manner.
>> That means release Core (incl. DP) and Windsor and as many facilities
>> as possible on the span of very short time (like 2,3 days) and in
>> addition to keeping them in separate .zip packages as it is now,
>> provide a Castle.zip that would like a snowball accumulate all the
>> other projects as they get released soon after that.
>>
>> Jan is not the first person to request that and I don't really see any
>> reason to not provide such package.
>>
>> Krzysztof
>>
>> On 31 Mar, 23:16, John Simons <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Jan,
>>
>> > Thanks for your feedback/suggestions, very much appreciated.
>>
>> > > if I could just download the whole castle stack in one big package or
>>
>> > at least state that all released packages are version compatible.
>> > I guess the problem is that they may not be compatible! We are trying our 
>> > best to keep the sf.net packages compatible, but because Castle projects 
>> > are now independent we cannot guarantee that they are always compatible.
>>
>> > >Ideally, is there a place where I just can dl dlls build against the
>>
>> > release versions of core, dynproxy2 etc?
>> > You should be able to d/l the compiled assemblies for the projects that 
>> > haven't been released yet from our build 
>> > server,http://builds.castleproject.org/.
>>
>> > Regarding the projects that haven't been released yet:
>> > Castle.Facilities.ActiveRecordIntegration -> No one seems to care for this 
>> > project, we are still looking for a project leader, do you want to be the 
>> > leader for this project?
>> > Castle.Facilities.AutomaticTransactionManagement  -> Not sure why it 
>> > hasn't been released yet, Henrik any news on this front?
>> > Castle.Facilities.Logging -> This project is now released as part of Core, 
>> > seehttp://www.castleproject.org/castle/projects.html
>> > Castle.Facilities.NHibernateIntegration -> Not sure why it hasn't been 
>> > released yet, Tuna any reason to not release this facility?
>>
>> > Cheers
>> > John
>>
>> > ________________________________
>> > From: Jan Limpens <[email protected]>
>> > To: [email protected]
>> > Sent: Thu, 1 April, 2010 6:30:47 AM
>> > Subject: dependencies and facilities
>>
>> > Hello,
>>
>> > I am trying to get my rhino.commons up to date in therms on what castle 
>> > dlls it uses (among others).
>>
>> > By downloading each and every package from the sourceforge repository and 
>> > checking each and every version number of every dll contained therein I 
>> > found out, that all of those seem to combine. hurray!
>> > ... where I must say, you could have spared me this tedious work, if I 
>> > could just download the whole castle stack in one big package or at least 
>> > state that all released packages are version compatible.
>> > Being separate projects does not necessarily mean, they have to be 
>> > (exclusively) placed in separate zip files. This can be of value, but for 
>> > the typical user, I am pretty sure, it would be much easier to just get 
>> > everything that was released and is compatible as on simple and single 
>> > download.
>>
>> > What I am missing are the facilities...
>> > Castle.Facilities.ActiveRecordIntegration
>> > Castle.Facilities.AutomaticTransactionManagement
>> > Castle.Facilities.Logging
>>
>> > (and for my own projects Castle.Facilities.NHibernateIntegration)
>>
>> > commons mainly needs them just for it's tests to pass, but still - where 
>> > are they?
>> > Ideally, is there a place where I just can dl dlls build against the 
>> > release versions of core, dynproxy2 etc?
>>
>> > Thanks, and please don't be offended by my criticism, at least it does not 
>> > come without a suggestion on how to make it better :)
>> > I suppose I will have to get the sources somewhere and build / fix it 
>> > against the releases. You can be sure, I would be glad if I could save me 
>> > that hassle...
>>
>> > Thanks for all the great software :)
>>
>> > --
>> > Jan
>>
>> > --
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> > "Castle Project Development List" group.
>> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> > [email protected].
>> > For more options, visit this group 
>> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Castle Project Development List" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.

Reply via email to