> What do you think about these merges I'm wondering about people using ActiveRecord and or Services.Transactions which would not like to depend on Windsor ? is it something we should take care of?
> what do you think we should do about "dead" repositories? emptying them and just leave a readme with follow-up note : """ Castle.DynamicProxy has been merged into Castle.Core, please find latest version of Castle.Core at http://github.com/castleproject/Castle.Core """ On May 20, 4:20 pm, Krzysztof Koźmic (2) <[email protected]> wrote: > We have few repositories now on Github that point to projects that > aren't developed on their own anymore: > > - DynamicProxy, which was merged into Core > - DictionaryAdapter which was merged into Core > - InversionOfControl, it is all Windsor now so perhaps the name should > reflect that? > > I also think we should merge few other smaller projects into one to > minimize the administrative overhead: > > - Castle.Facilities.AutomaticTransactionManagement and > Castle.Services.Transaction should be kept together > > - Castle.Facilities.ActiveRecordIntegration should live with > ActiveRecord > > - Castle.Facilities.Synchronize should live with Windsor? > > What do you think about these merges, and what do you think we should > do about "dead" repositories? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Castle Project Development List" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group > athttp://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
