>From my point of view, the point is that as Ken previously mention most MR >users are already using it with container integration (we also had a poll on >this) and I would bet that most are using the Windsor container, so why not >give the users what they want out of the box?
Cheers John On 18/07/2010, at 10:21, hammett <[email protected]> wrote: > Ok, but what's the value? The SP is lightweight - almost no reflection > - as opposed to containers, not to mention the additional dependency. > > 2010/7/16 Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected]>: >> I don't think John wants hard reference. He just wants an actual contianer >> as a must, as opposed to cripled SL. >> Fully utilizing IoC principle, which means with no hard reference to the >> container. > > > -- > Cheers, > hammett > http://hammett.castleproject.org/ > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Castle Project Development List" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
