The main cons with ActiveRecordMediator that I have is relying on a
static class, (not dependecy injectable).

The signatures are also not all easy to use for some operations (for
exemple, when I want to access the ISession object, there is no simple
overload, I have to pass a parameter which is useless when using
anonymous methods).

I would like to have a base IActiveRecordMediator which contains the
barebone operations, and a set of extension methods rather than a big
static class.

Does it makes sense?

On Jul 23, 11:45 am, Markus Zywitza <[email protected]> wrote:
> Can you please go into details on this?
>
> -Markus
>
> 2010/7/15 Gauthier Segay <[email protected]>:
>
>
>
> > I'd like to see Pagination in core and being used by activerecord and
> > other frameworks.
>
> > Things leads to others, I'd love to see a well thought
> > IActiveRecordMediator, because I don't like using the static classes.
>
> > On Jul 14, 11:40 pm, John Simons <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Another one to consider merging into Castle.MonoRail.Framework is
> >> Castle.Components.Pagination.
> >> Thoughts?
> >> I don't think is used by any other project?
>
> >> John
>
> >> ________________________________
> >> From: Gauthier Segay <[email protected]>
> >> To: Castle Project Development List <[email protected]>
> >> Sent: Wed, 14 July, 2010 5:20:18 AM
> >> Subject: Re: Merging assemblies in MR
>
> >> moving it to Core would make more sense (to me), if it hasn't any
> >> dependency one System.Web
>
> >> On Jul 13, 7:04 am, Mauricio Scheffer <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:> MvcContrib uses Binder, but I agree with Ken, they can just ref MR 
> >> instead.
>
> >> > On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 3:42 AM, John Simons
>
> >> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
> >> > > I may be missing something but is Binder now only used by MR?
>
> >> > > Because if it is, we should merge it into MR.
>
> >> > > ------------------------------
> >> > > *From:* Ken Egozi <[email protected]>
> >> > > *To:* [email protected]
> >> > > *Sent:* Fri, 9 July, 2010 11:13:52 PM
> >> > > *Subject:* Re: Merging assemblies in MR
>
> >> > > +1
>
> >> > > 2010/7/9 Henry Conceição <[email protected]>
>
> >> > >> Go ahead.
>
> >> > >> Cheers,
> >> > >> Henry Conceição
>
> >> > >> On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 11:58 PM, John Simons 
> >> > >> <[email protected]>
> >> > >> wrote:
> >> > >> > Since everyone else is doing it!
>
> >> > >> > What are people's thoughts on merging a few MR assemblies?
> >> > >> > And which ones?
>
> >> > >> > I'm looking at:
> >> > >> > Castle.MonoRail.TestSupport + Castle.MonoRail.TransformFilters  ->
> >> > >> > Castle.Monorail.Framework
>
> >> > >> > Cheers
> >> > >> > John
>
> >> > >> > --
> >> > >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> >> > >> Groups
> >> > >> > "Castle Project Development List" group.
> >> > >> > To post to this group, send email to
> >> > >> [email protected].
> >> > >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>
> >> >[email protected]<castle-project-devel%2Bu
> >> > n
> >> >[email protected]>
> >> > >> .
> >> > >> > For more options, visit this group at
> >> > >> >http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
>
> >> > >> --
> >> > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> >> > >> Groups
> >> > >> "Castle Project Development List" group.
> >> > >> To post to this group, send email to
> >> > >> [email protected].
> >> > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> > >> [email protected]<castle-project-devel%2Bun
> >> >[email protected]>
> >> > >> .
> >> > >> For more options, visit this group at
> >> > >>http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
>
> >> > > --
> >> > > Ken Egozi.
> >> > >http://www.kenegozi.com/blog
> >> > >http://www.delver.com
> >> > >http://www.musicglue.com
> >> > >http://www.castleproject.org
> >> > >http://www.idcc.co.il-הכנס הקהילתי הראשון למפתחי דוטנט - בואו בהמוניכם
>
> >> > > --
> >> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> >> > > Groups
> >> > > "Castle Project Development List" group.
> >> > > To post to this group, send email to 
> >> > > [email protected]
> >> > > .
> >> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> > > [email protected]<castle-project-devel%2Bun
> >> >[email protected]>
> >> > > .
> >> > > For more options, visit this group at
> >> > >http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
>
> >> > > --
> >> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> >> > > Groups
> >> > > "Castle Project Development List" group.
> >> > > To post to this group, send email to 
> >> > > [email protected]
> >> > > .
> >> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> > > [email protected]<castle-project-devel%2Bun
> >> >[email protected]>
> >> > > .
> >> > > For more options, visit this group at
> >> > >http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
>
> >> --
> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> >> "Castle Project Development List" group.
> >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> [email protected].
> >> For more options, visit this group 
> >> athttp://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> > "Castle Project Development List" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> > [email protected].
> > For more options, visit this group 
> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.

Reply via email to