Regardless of the outcome of this discussion I will modify the build so it includes the framework it was built for in the assemblyinfo, just like in the NAnt days. I am on holiday and have a barely functioning net connection at best over here at our italian campsite, so could be a while before i push.
-- Roelof 2010/9/1, Jonathon Rossi <[email protected]>: > 2010/9/1 Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected]> > >> I agree we should make it somehow more visible what is the target runtime >> of the assembly you're dealing with. >> >> Roelof - could we put this in the "File Description" or "Product Name" >> during the build, so that it would say: >> >> "Castle Windsor, .NET 4 Client Profile" not just "Castle Windsor" as it is >> now? >> > I agree. Back with NAnt we used to include the .NET runtime version it was > built for so you know which assembly you have, which allowed you to easily > know whether you have a conditionally compiled one because the new code uses > new APIs of the BCLs. This is important whether we make CP changes or not. > > -- > Jono > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Castle Project Development List" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. > > -- Verzonden vanaf mijn mobiele apparaat -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
