Oh, you're right! Looks like the information I found was old. Here's
a blog post of interest on the topic:
http://blogs.taiga.nl/martijn/2009/06/24/new-adventures-under-medium-trust/
So then, back to my original question. What do people think of this
new approach for maintaining a single assembly for client and full?
Patrick Earl
2010/9/3 Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected]>:
> that's not right.
>
> DynamicProxy does work in medium trust from what I understand...
>
> 2010/9/3 Patrick Earl <[email protected]>
>>
>> K, guess I'll answer my own question. It sounds like generating
>> classes is not allowed in medium trust.
>>
>> I think I'll just go into a corner and sulk now. :(
>>
>> Sadtrick Earl
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 12:22 AM, Patrick Earl <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Okay, I've dug a little deeper and now believe that the client profile
>> > can be supported with just a single assembly and one breaking change.
>> >
>> > The breaking change would be that users would need to change this:
>> >
>> > <system.web>
>> > <httpModules>
>> > <add
>> > name="ar.sessionscope"
>> > type="Castle.ActiveRecord.Framework.SessionScopeWebModule,
>> > Castle.ActiveRecord" />
>> > </httpModules>
>> > </system.web>
>> >
>> > Into this:
>> >
>> > public class Global : System.Web.HttpApplication
>> > {
>> > public override void Init()
>> > {
>> > base.Init();
>> > SessionScopeWebModule.Init(this);
>> > }
>> > }
>> >
>> > Internally, the web module class would be generated at runtime through
>> > IL emission. Is anyone aware of any showstoppers with this approach?
>> > Is anyone aware of issues with medium trust, signing, or anything like
>> > that?
>> >
>> > Does this technique appeal to people more than the last two?
>> >
>> > Patrick Earl
>> >
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Castle Project Development List" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to
>> [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
>>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Castle Project Development List" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
