np,
cheers.

2010/9/20 Vadim Kantorov <[email protected]>

> Thanks for making it clear!
>
> On 19 сен, 22:25, Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected]> wrote:
> > VadimThis is by design.
> > In line arguments are for the root component only and are not propagated
> to
> > its dependencies (except for Internceptors) which is the only case when
> true
> > is passed to the method you mentioned.
> >
> > The reasoning IIRC was to avoid accidentally overriding dependencies for
> > some components deep in the graph.
> >
> > Krzysztof
> >
> > 2010/9/20 Vadim Kantorov <[email protected]>
> >
> >
> >
> > > Hi,
> >
> > > I need to override one service for the scope of a resolve operation.
> > > Like this:
> >
> > > ISession session = ...// get NH session from some tricky place
> > > var pbs = container.Resolve<IPermissionsBuilderService>(new
> > > {session});
> >
> > > Impl of IPBS depends on ISession and on IAuthorizationRepository (also
> > > depends on ISession).
> >
> > > The desired behavior would be resolving IPBS with the provided session
> > > in the IAuthorizationRepository as well.
> >
> > > What happens with build from master:
> > > ISession dependency is successfully resolved (via
> > > AdditionalParameters)
> > > IAuthorizationRepository cannot be resolved. I debugged into the
> > > sources and it seems that the reason lives in the method
> > > RebuildContextForParameter in DefaultDependencyResolver. If True was
> > > passed to the CreationContext constructor, everything would work. IMO
> > > it is a bug.
> > > Any considerations why is it False?
> >
> > > private CreationContext RebuildContextForParameter(CreationContext
> > > current, Type parameterType)
> > > {
> > >        if (parameterType.ContainsGenericParameters)
> > >        {
> > >                return current;
> > >        }
> >
> > >        return new CreationContext(parameterType, current, false);
> > > }
> >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Vadim
> >
> > > P.S. Worked around by creating a child container. Though I believe
> > > it's a bug anyway.
> >
> > > --
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups
> > > "Castle Project Development List" group.
> > > To post to this group, send email to
> [email protected]
> > > .
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > [email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]>
> <castle-project-devel%2bun­[email protected]>
> > > .
> > > For more options, visit this group at
> > >http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Castle Project Development List" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> .
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.

Reply via email to