Which seems to be the wrong way. MR framework should be supplying the API extension points for any validation framework to adhere to, and not the other way around. Or am I looking at the picture the wrong way?
Cheers John ________________________________ From: Henry Conceição <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Tue, 28 September, 2010 1:17:35 PM Subject: Re: Looking to get a resolution on Binder + Pagination The extension point is the validator project itself. You can implement a IValidatorRegistry/IValidatorRunner set to plug another framework. Cheers, Henry Conceição On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 11:05 PM, John Simons <[email protected]> wrote: > Binder depends on: > -ValidatorRunner > -ErrorSummary > > MR depends on: > -ValidatorRunner > -ErrorSummary > -ValidatorRegistry > -BrowserValidationConfiguration > -IValidator > -IBrowserValidationGenerator > -CachedValidationRegistry > -InputElementType > > Looking at it, MR is quite coupled to our Validation project, it would not > be easy to remove this coupling and allow MR to support any other validation > framework without major changes. > > Cheers > John > > ________________________________ > From: Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Tue, 28 September, 2010 12:38:36 PM > Subject: Re: Looking to get a resolution on Binder + Pagination > > Does Mr depend on validator except for via binder? > > sent from my HTC Desire > > On 28/09/2010 12:27 PM, "John Simons" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Binder depends on Validation, one interface: >http://github.com/castleproject/Castle.Components.Binder/blob/master/src/Castle.Components.Binder/IDataBinder.cs >s > > Cheers > John > > ________________________________ > From: Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Tue, 28 September, 2010 12:20:07 PM > Subject: Re: Looking to get a resolution on Binder + Pagination > > What's the dependency chain between them? > > Does pagination depend on Binder? What for? > > On 28/09/20... > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Castle Project Deve... > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Castle Project Development List" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Castle Project Development List" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
