Sorry, I dont work on that team. On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 4:49 PM, John Simons <[email protected]> wrote: > I think is about time we say goodbye and thanks for inspiring MS to > build Razor to NVelocity :) > Razor is looking good (minus too many curly brackets :( ) > I wish they removed half of the opening curly brackets from code like: > @foreach(var p in product) { > ... > } > What is the point of the opening bracke...@? > Razor should support: > @foreach(var p in product) > .... > } > > Hamilton, please let them know :) > > > Cheers > John > > On Nov 22, 11:29 am, Henry Conceição <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Well, on NVelocity (and other ve's that doesn't support it) people >> will have to go only with the dynamic approach. >> >> Does the clr's dynamic works on NVelocity? I don't know. But a common >> dictionary can act as propertybag there, using the nvelocity >> dictionary syntax. Other poco objects would be binded on NVelocity >> pretty straightforward. >> >> PS: NVelocity support is not on my plans. It'll be very welcome if >> anyone wants to step in and work on it, but I'm not planning to do any >> work related to it. >> >> Cheers, >> Henry Conceição >> >> On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 2:59 AM, John Simons <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > I do like the approach you taking Henry :) >> > Regrading statically typed views, do all VE support this? I'm asking >> > because I know for sure that NVelocity does not!, on the other hand >> > NVelocity = Razor so I assume we dropping NVelocity right? >> >> > Cheers >> > John >> >> > On Nov 18, 8:27 am, Henry Conceição <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi folks, >> >> >> I'm playing the view, viewengine and would like some input about >> >> passing values to the view. >> >> >> On mr2 we're used to use the propertybag to store the values for the >> >> view. I do like more this approach than have a view constrained by a >> >> typed ViewModel. >> >> >> So, my ideia now is to send a single object to the view. No contract >> >> to follow. It can be the (new) dynamic PropertyBag or a poco. >> >> >> Do you think that this is enough? Or we really should have the ability >> >> of create views statically typed? >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> Henry Conceição >> >> > -- >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> > "Castle Project Development List" group. >> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> > [email protected]. >> > For more options, visit this group >> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Castle Project Development List" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. > >
-- Cheers, hammett http://hammett.castleproject.org/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
