Indeed. Read-only transactions are not uncommon. That's why I think you're right with the change.
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 8:19 AM, Jordan <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello all, > > Hammett accepted my read only transactions patch but doesn't have the > time to merge it. > This is another attempt to demonstrate why it is useful in the hope > that someone else will do so. > If you don't want the patch, fair enough, I'll leave you in peace :) > > > If the following three points apply to you then you want this patch: > > Do you: > 1) Use Nhibernate > 2) Use castle validator and put your validation on your domain > objects. > 3) Like to explicitly mark out your transactions. > > -- Cheers, hammett http://hammett.castleproject.org/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
