That becomes unimportant once we standardise on nuget and openwrap Cheers, John
On 18/03/2011, at 13:56, Henry Conceição <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't like sf too, but at least for me, it has the best cdn/download speed. > > Cheers, > Henry Conceição > > > > On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 11:29 PM, John Simons > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Couldn't agree more, we really need to automate the deployment. >> Could we also consider not have to upload files to sf.net? I myself find >> that currently the slowest step in the release. >> >> Cheers, John >> On 18/03/2011, at 0:08, Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Sounds awesome mate. >> >> We do need to get much more of the release process automated, including >> pushing of packages to OW and nuget. I remember discussing this with Roelof >> a while back, and I think he made a list of things he thinks should be done >> in the build scripts in order to automate some of this stuff... Not sure it >> was ever published. >> >> cheers, >> Krzysztof >> >> On 17/03/2011 10:40 PM, Chris Canal wrote: >> >> Hi guys, >> Just wanted to give you a quick note that I'm putting together some OpenWrap >> packags for Castle. I'm looking at setting them up properly on OpenWrap >> with scopes for picking versions of things, ie. Castle.Facilities.Logging >> -scope castle, etc. >> I will post the results here and create a temp. openwrap server so everyone >> can try them out and see how they feel. I think I can then generate nuget >> packages off the wrap (@seb can correct me if I'm wrong.). I will also try >> and add build targets to the build scripts to ease package generation. >> I need, and will build the following: >> Castle.Core >> Castle.Windsor >> Logging (log4net and NLog) >> Facilities.NHIbernate >> Trans/AutoTx >> Sync >> Validators >> If I get them built OK and everyone is happy, I will setup the other >> projects not listed. >> All this sound ok? >> Cheers >> Chris >> -- >> "Any fool can write code that a computer can understand. Good programmers >> write code that humans can understand." >> -Martin Fowler et al, Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Castle Project Development List" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Castle Project Development List" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Castle Project Development List" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Castle Project Development List" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
