+1 on the first point.
As for the second, no one reads descriptions. Can we set a different
icon for the source and binary package so that they're clearly different
at first sight?
On 28/04/2011 9:49 AM, John Simons wrote:
I don't think that is a problem.
Most of the time people click on the link on the website, and that is
a direct link.
And we can add a description to the package.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected]>
*To:* [email protected]
*Sent:* Thursday, 28 April 2011 9:25 AM
*Subject:* Re: Our build scripts, nuget, openwrap and related stuff
problem with github last time I checked is that it's confusing as hell
what is a binary and what is a source package.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to
[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to
[email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle
Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
