Excellent, no need to worry about adding a service behavior to add a custom operation context to store the objects, etc.
Just plain good stuff, Thanks On May 25, 10:29 am, Craig Neuwirt <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, you should be able to do it without registering the facility > > On May 25, 2011, at 8:06 AM, Juan wrote: > > > Can I use the PerWcfOperation lifestyle in my project without using > > any of the other WCF facility features? Do I even need to register the > > facility? > > > I have an existent project in which I use castle for my component > > resolutions, and thought I could leverage the wcf lifestyle. > > > There is this post (http://peplowdown.wordpress.com/2010/07/01/castle- > > windsor-wcf-lifestyle-perwcfmessagelifestylemanager/) which points to > > a hand rolled implementation. The main differences I see, there is > > more to put together in the wcf configuration (servicebehavior, > > extensions) but the the one from wcf facility, it seems to be a simple > > lifestyle setting and nothing else? no other config changes? > > > Looking at the demos and tests in github for the facility, I couldn't > > find a quick answer to my question. Anyone could point in the right > > direction? > > > Thanks > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Castle Project Development List" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > For more options, visit this group > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
