I'm wondering if this is (conceptually) supported or not in the current incarnation of MR3
http://castle.uservoice.com/forums/38553-monorail-v3/suggestions/456479-supports-multiple-viewengine-rendering-for-the-sam?ref=title I'm not sure what's implied with this comment: // we need to make sure this interface allows for recursive view engines which is found there: https://github.com/castleproject/Castle.MonoRail3/blob/master/src/Castle.MonoRail/Mvc/Mvc.ViewEngines.Api.fs but it's probably describing something else. I think it's an important feature despite I remember Ayende was saying that it was unlikely to happen, on my side I think it's likely to happen and gives choice of the right tool for the right template, and blended migration of template/viewengine in long lived applications. This is also a reason for having a set of concepts such as the template lambdas and view components baked at MR level that are able to inter-operate between view engines, something which seems to be lacking in MS MVC viewengine infrastructure. I understand it's probably something difficult to get done right if you want to have those framework level concepts to interact properly between view engines, like implementing the include semantic which works across view engine is probably a not easy problem to solve. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
