On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 5:54 AM, Ken Egozi <[email protected]> wrote: > I like the question mark at the end of hammet's subject. > I do not get why the internal modelling of a system (actually of a certain > bounded context within a system) should be reflected in the public http API > 1:1
It doesnt need to be > If anything, the disruptive thing to do is to > eliminate the controller/action rule. What do you mean? > I'd also dis-allow mapping overloaded actions to routes, making the action > selector code (one of the more complex parts of MR1-2 imo) trivial, and > eliminate many "surprise" bugs in usage scenarios. Let's continue to discuss on high level what we want to achieve. Then we can proceed to discuss the specifics on the fx design/impl. -- Cheers, hammett http://hammett.castleproject.org/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
