Why do we need a repos under castle if you're working on your own repos? On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 6:48 AM, Henrik Feldt <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > You have commit access to haf/Castle.IO and haf/Castle.Transactions > > Castle.Transactions contains Castle.IO till the next release, which is > probably an alpha of Castle.IO and a GA of Castle.Transactions and a beta of > Castle.Transactions.IO. > > After this release, I plan on separating that code into its own repository > ON MY OWN GITHUB which you have commit access to. I will then merge that > into Castle.Transactions when Castle.Transactions or Castle.IO is released, > and push to castleproject/Castle.Transactions. > > How about this? > > Cheers, > Henrik > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Sebastien Lambla > Sent: den 26 oktober 2011 15:36 > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: Castle.IO & OpenFileSystem > > From where I stand right now (and until the Castle integration / commit > access / integration issues are resolved), I may have to simply continue > handling OFS with the existing APIs and backport your changes to the project > under the OFS namespace / brand. > > I'll leave it for a couple more weeks, see where we are with all that then > before making a decision. > ________________________________________ > From: [email protected] > [[email protected]] on behalf of Henrik [[email protected]] > Sent: 25 October 2011 14:27 > To: Castle Project Development List > Subject: Re: Castle.IO & OpenFileSystem > > As you state yourself there have been changes to the public API - could we > provide types that match the public API in Castle.IO matching what openwrap > expects? > > Would you like to have a look yourself at the code? At the moment, you can > work off of haf/Castle.Transactions, but the IO will be moved to its own > top-level project in haf/Castle.IO shortly. > > Other than that, I think it sounds good. > > Cheers, > Henrik > > On Oct 25, 9:55 am, Sebastien Lambla <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi guys, >> >> So I've now researched things enough and prototyped where we are with OFS > in regards to openwrap and backward/forward compat. >> >> As I feared, we're a bit stuck: if and when we upgrade OFS, old versions > of OpenWrap may load up the wrong version at runtime and break, so I need to > ensure binary compat for the foreseeable future. >> >> The transition to Castle.IO is going to be a bit complicated and is > probably gonna involve wrapping things from one namespace to the other > during the transition. With OW 2.0 we won't have the problem as dependency > resolution for bootstrap package is is more accurate, and auto-upgrades will > not happen by accident. >> >> How we're gonna go from A to B is gonna be a challenge but ah well, it's > probably worth it. OFS will be migrated to be a layer on top of the native > Castle.IO, and provide platform-levelling (so we can "fake" symlinks, > hardlinks or some transactions on platforms / file systems that don't > support them, or at least try very hard). >> >> Anway, that's the current plans as they exist. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Castle Project Development List" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Castle Project Development List" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Castle Project Development List" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. > >
-- Cheers, hammett http://hammett.castleproject.org/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
