Let me quote: You don’t specify which mixin interfaces you want to forward to which > mixin. This is implicit – if mixin implements an interface, it will be > forwarded to that mixin instance, unless someone else implements it as > well. You can’t have two mixins that implement the same interface. You > can’t have mixin implement same interface as target, nor can you have a > mixin implementing one of additional interfaces to proxy. In any of these > cases when trying to create a proxy you will get an error. > > This is not a very serious issue though, and I think in most cases it > should be enough. In case you need more power, Dynamic Proxy v2.2 will have > better support for mixin, allowing scenarios that are not possible in > current version. > I specifically address the statetement that DP 2.2 will have better support for mixnis. I wonder what has actually changed recently.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/castle-project-devel/-/kJPfLg6dOXYJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
