It's? Where did you saw it?

Cheers,
Henry Conceição



On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 3:13 AM, John Jeffery <[email protected]> wrote:
> I was under the impression that the need to declare a session
> transaction inside a transaction scope was fixed with NH 3.0 and
> later? Do you think it is still necessary?
>
> I for one would be very interested to see what you are doing with NH
> integration with Castle Henry, if you ever get it to the point where
> you want to show someone else.
>
> Cheers -- John
>
> On Jan 5, 1:54 pm, Henry Conceição <[email protected]> wrote:
>> A simple update of tx the machinery doesn't work. At least if you want
>> to follow the guidelines preached by nhibernate (even with a ambient
>> tx, you must have begin session transaction). The simplest way it to
>> go with implicit session transaction (like henrik's facility does),
>> but it can lead to nasty dtc issues (from what i've read on blogs and
>> stackoverflow).
>>
>> I'm trying to get they working together, but I'm not confident in
>> publish it atm. Want to test it a little more....
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Henry Conceição
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 1:21 AM, ross <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Hi John,
>>
>> > I'm using an older version - 2.5.1.0- which still works ok.
>>
>> > The reason for this is because it compiles in .Net 3.5 which is a
>> > requirement for the project I'm working on.
>>
>> > The 3.x version uses some .Net 4.0 specific features- I did manage to
>> > replace most of them at one stage but due to time constraints didn't
>> > get back around to it.
>>
>> > Cheers,
>>
>> > Ross.
>>
>> > On Jan 5, 1:10 pm, John Jeffery <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> Hi Ross,
>>
>> >> What version of Castle.Services.Transactions were you using? I am
>> >> interested in getting the NH facility going as well, and I checked out
>> >> from the trunk and applied your patch.
>>
>> >> All good so far, but I am also getting a compile error in src
>> >> \Castle.Facilities.NHibernateIntegration\Internal\ResourceAdapter.cs
>>
>> >> The ResourceAdapter class implements an interface
>> >> Castle.Services.Transactions.IResource, which no longer exists in the
>> >> latest version of Castle.Services.Transactions (I used version
>> >> 3.0.202.2202 from nuget). I have had a look around trying to work out
>> >> if this interface has been renamed or moved, but it would appear that
>> >> it has been completely removed. Any suggestions gratefully received.
>>
>> >> Cheers -- John
>>
>> >> On Dec 21 2011, 11:19 am, ross <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> >> > Posted the issue and some patches to the issue tracker:
>>
>> >> >http://issues.castleproject.org/issue/FACILITIES-156
>>
>> >> > On Dec 19, 4:40 pm, ross <[email protected]> wrote:> Hi All,
>>
>> >> > > I posted on Stack Overflow previously as I was having trouble with the
>> >> > > NHibernateIntegration facility in Windsor when working alongside
>> >> > > Castle Windsor 3. The question is located at:
>>
>> >> > >http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8557327/castle-windsor-3-fluent-nh...
>>
>> >> > > I have since recompiled the NHibernateIntegration Facility DLL file
>> >> > > with a few changes to get it working and was wondering if this is
>> >> > > worth creating a patch for? The changes are:
>>
>> >> > > For src\Castle.Facilities.NHibernateIntegration\Internal
>> >> > > \SessionFactoryActivator.cs:
>>
>> >> > > Before: public override object Create(CreationContext context)
>> >> > > After: public override object Create(CreationContext context, Burden
>> >> > > burden)
>>
>> >> > > For src\Castle.Facilities.NHibernateIntegration\Internal
>> >> > > \NHSessionComponentInspector.cs
>>
>> >> > > Before: model.Dependencies.Add(new
>> >> > > DependencyModel(DependencyType.Service, null,
>> >> > > typeof(NHSessionInterceptor), false));
>>
>> >> > > After: model.Dependencies.Add(new DependencyModel(null,
>> >> > > typeof(NHSessionInterceptor), false));
>>
>> >> > > Thanks,
>>
>> >> > > Ross.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> >> - Show quoted text -
>>
>> > --
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> > "Castle Project Development List" group.
>> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> > [email protected].
>> > For more options, visit this group 
>> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Castle Project Development List" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.

Reply via email to